Legal Opinion

Anna C. Bachand v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 15, 2026No. 3:25-cv-02061Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANNA C. BACHAND, Case No. 25-cv-02061-MMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 9 v. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT; GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 10 RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE JUDGMENT; FINDINGS OF FACT AND INSURANCE COMPANY, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 11 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court are motions for judgment pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal 14 Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Anna Bachand (“Bachand”) and defendant Reliance 15 Standard Life Insurance Company (“Reliance”) have filed their respective briefs, and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Donald Jebian v. Hewlett-Packard Company Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan Erisa PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Gallo v. Amoco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Muniz v. Amec Construction Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API