Legal Opinion

Carmichael v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 15, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff after a trial before the court and a jury in the Oity Court of the city of New York.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

In this action upon a policy of life insurance, the plaintiff set forth, in part of her complaint, not only the policy, but also the conditions and provisions endorsed thereon, and the application, declaration and warranty signed by the insured. The latter consisted of answers to a number of questions and a declaration by the insured in which he warranted that the representations and answers made therein were complete, strictly correct and true; that any false or untrue answer should render the policy null and void, and that the policy should not be binding upon the company unless, at noon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sternaman v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Breeze v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. Jacobs v. Northwestern Life Assur. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holloway v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915
  2. Baum v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API