Legal Opinion

Warner v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 2, 1993No. 10-90-133-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

CUMMINGS, Justice.

This is round three of an appeal by the Warners from a take-nothing judgment in a slip-and-fall case against H.E. Butt Grocery Co. The trial court submitted only the Warners’ premises-liability theory, which the jury answered favorably to H.E.B. On original submission, this court held that the trial court erroneously denied the Warners’ requested submission of an additional theory of recovery. Finding that the error was reasonably calculated to cause and probably did cause rendition of an improper judgment, we reversed the trial court’s take-nothing judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Adam Dante Corporation v. SharpeTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. WarnerTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Warner v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ramirez v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API