Legal Opinion
Myrtice Schoemakers,petitioner v. Office of Personnel Management
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 22, 1999No. 98-3144PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) affirming a decision of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) that the appellant Myrtice Schoemakers was not entitled to a survivor’s annuity because her husband had not applied for such annuity within two years of his marriage to her, as the governing statute required. We affirm.
I
When Conrad Schoemakers retired as a federal employee in 1981, he was unmarried. In October 1990 he married the appellant.
More than four years later, in June 1995, Mr. Schoemakers filed with OPM a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Billie Brush v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Minor Gressley v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Wallace M. Crown v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Helen Darsigny v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
3Cited by17 opinions
- Carole A. Simpson v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Alejandra S. Taylor v. Office of Personnel Management, Merit Systems Protection Board2016
- Alejandra S. Taylor v. Office of Personnel Management, Merit Systems Protection Board2016
- Auraria Student Housing at the Regency, LLC v. Campus Village Apartments, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2011
- Authority of OPM to Direct Health Insurer Not to Enroll Individual Deemed Eligible by Employing Agency, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.