Legal Opinion
(PC) Hill v. Campbell
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 6, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01103Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TONY HILL, Case No. 1:23-cv-01103 JLT EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO REOPEN CASE AND REQUEST FOR 13 v. RELEASE 14 TAMMY COMPAELL, (Docs. 21, 22, and 23) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Tony Hill alleges violations of his civil rights in his complaint. (Doc. 1.) The Court 18 found Plaintiff is subject to the three-strikes bar of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and he did not satisfy the 19 “imminent danger of serious physical injury” exception to § 1915(g). Therefore, the Court 20 ordered Plaintiff to pay the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Paula Martineau & Georganna Lagen, AKA King v. Ron Angelone, Director of Prisons Frankie Sue Del Papa, Attorney General for the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994