Legal Opinion · Dissent

Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund v. Stevens

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 2, 1986No. 67402Published

1DissentBoyd, Justice

I dissent and would approve the district court’s decision because I believe the Marketable Record Title Act when first enacted 1 was intended to apply to claims of the state as well as to those of private persons. Odom v. Deltona Corp., 341 So.2d 977 (Fla.1976). Included among the statutory words “all estates, interests, claims or charges whatsoever,”2 based on the apparent intent of the legislature, were long-dormant claims of the state grounded on the assertion that state land grants did not include sovereignty lands. This intent is made clear by the provision now codified in section…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. TRUSTEES OF INTERNAL IMPROVE. FUND v. ClaughtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Odom v. Deltona Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Coastal Petroleum v. American CyanamidSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Trustees of Internal Improvement Fund v. LobeanSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  5. Pembroke Pembroke v. Peninsular Terminal Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API