Legal Opinion
Dominick Pampillonia v. Concord Line, A/s, and Third-Party v. Court Carpentry and Marine Contracting Co., Third-Party and International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 12, 1976No. 139PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
536 F.2d 476
Dominick PAMPILLONIA, Plaintiff,
v.
CONCORD LINE, A/S, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
COURT CARPENTRY AND MARINE CONTRACTING CO., Third-Party
Defendant-Appellant,
and
International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant.
No. 139, Docket 75-7318.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Nov. 20, 1975.
Decided Jan. 12, 1976.
William P. Kain, Jr., New York City (Thomas F. Molanphy, Richard V. Licata, and Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City, on the brief), for defendant and third-party plaintiff-appellee Concord Line, A/S.
Victor S.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Interocean Shipping Company v. National Shipping and Trading Corporation and Hellenic International Shipping, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Empire Transport, Inc., Owner of the Steamship Potomac v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- King v. Deutsche Dampfs-GesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Pampillonia v. Concord LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lawrence W. SUTTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Canizzo v. Farrell Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Anthony Canizzo, and Cross-Appellant v. Farrell Lines, Inc., and Cross-Appellee, and Universal Terminal and Stevedoring Corp., and Third Party Farrell Lines, Inc., Third Party v. Frank J. Holleran, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978