Legal Opinion

United States v. Durrani

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 12, 1987No. Crim. No. B-86-59 (TFGD)Published

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PRETRIAL MOTIONS

DALY, Chief Judge.

The defendant, Arif Durrani, was charged in October, 1986 with violating provisions of the Arms Export Control Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2778. The indictment, which contained one count, has since been superseded by a three-count indictment which charges two additional violations of the same Act. The Court has already ruled on the motions that pertain to the initial indictment. What follows is a ruling on the motions submitted in relation to the supersedeas.

The initial indictment, returned October 8, 1986, charged the defendant with a single violation of the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API