Legal Opinion

David Crystal, Inc. v. Ehrlich-Newmark Trucking Co.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided September 18, 1970Published

1Opinion of the CourtBentley Kassal, J.

Plaintiff’s application for leave to reargue is granted. Upon such reargument and reconsideration of the original and additional papers presented, the decision'of this court is recalled and the following is substituted in place thereof.

Defendant, as a common carrier for hire in interstate commerce, concededly received and failed to deliver a property shipment received from plaintiff. The defense, in essence, is that the loss resulted from a hijacking on the streets of New York City of the defendant’s truck, containing this shipment. Defendant contends that the loss resulted by reason of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mairs v. . Baltimore Ohio R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Lang v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. American Cigarette & Cigar Co. v. GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. E. Gerli & Co. v. Compagnie Générale TransatlantiqueNew York Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API