Remington v. Judd

An examination of the record satisfies us that there is sufficient evidence to support the finding by the jury that the negligence of defendant’s driver, who either *340knew or should have known of the presence of plaintiff’s vehicle in front of him just prior to the accident, was the proximate cause of the collision, and that there is sufficient, though scanty, evidence to support the assessment of damages, and no useful purpose would be served by a discussion óf the details.

Many rulings of the court during the trial are assigned as errors by the appellant, and though we are satisfied that the…