Legal Opinion
King v. Six Ninety & Two Realty Corp.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided November 28, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
On January 2, 1934, the plaintiff was injured while visiting premises 1049 Sixth avenue, New York city, owned by appellant Six Ninety and Two Realty Corporation. In 1932 the owner had executed an assignment of rents to defendant New York Title and Mortgage Company, which had gone into possession and control through its agent. On December 15, 1933, the title company had assigned the rents to the United States Trust Company (not a party) which had in turn taken possession and control of the premises. The assignment to the title company provided among other things that the assignee might take…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. . Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Altz v. . LeibersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Potter v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- McGowan v. MorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Williams v. UtNew York Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. One Hundred Eight West Forty Ninth Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Torres v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1969
- City of Newark v. AdlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Pharm v. LituchyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939
- Board of Health v. AndriotisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.