Hulse v. Michigan Sugar Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clinton; Searle, J. Assumpsit by Roy Hulse against the Michigan Sugar Company for breach of a special contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1DissentMoore, J.
From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff' for the sum of $300, the case is brought here by writ of error. The plaintiff sued to recover damages for defendant’s refusal to receive sugar beets grown during the season of 1911 for its sugar campaign of 1911-12. These beets were grown in pursuance of two written contracts. The plaintiff’s declaration was on the common counts in assumpsit and a special count upon each of the contracts. It is alleged the defendant refused to receive the beets after 'they were grown and ready for delivery “in violation of the terms and conditions of said agreement…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stange v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Reinforced Concrete Pipe Co. v. BoyesMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Greenwood v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Coon v. SpauldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Hill v. MathewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889