Ray Clifton v. Ruby McCammack
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 49A02-1404-CT-276
RUSH, Chief Justice.
In Indiana, there are two rules under which a person can recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress. One of these — the bystander rale — requires, in part, that the person claiming emotional trauma meet certain “circumstantial” factors, which this Court has previously held are questions of law. Specifically, under our precedent, the claimant must demonstrate that the scene viewed was essentially as it was at the time of the incident, that the victim was in essentially the same…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Rickey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Bowen v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Marsillett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Adam Horton v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Lisa Coward v. Gagne & Sons Concrete Blocks, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- Blade-Thompson v. FiesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- Mills v. Cabell County Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2023
- PUCKETT v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.