Good v. Good

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The record *683amply supports the judgment. The Trial Justice, however, should have made findings of fact or, in his memorandum decision, should have stated the facts, and not merely conclusions of law, deemed essential to the decision (CPLR 4213, subd. [b] ; Matter of Harris v. Doley, 22 A D 2d 769; Manson v. Manson, 10 A D 2d 664; Kundla v. Symans, 9 A D 2d 1021). Since the record reveals such facts, in the interests of saving judicial time and further litigation we make the following findings which the Trial Justice should have made (De…