Legal Opinion

People v. Speight

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of trial counsel is without merit. Initially, we note that the record indicates that the defense counsel demonstrated complete familiarity with the law and the facts, made appropriate motions, vigorously cross-examined the People’s witnesses and strenuously argued the defendant’s position to the jury. Further, the defense counsel advanced the best defenses available to his client, those of intoxication and extreme emotional disturbance. The decision not to introduce expert testimony on the subject of intent, in light…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People v. RollockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. ThwaitesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API