Carnation Co. v. Hill
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, C.J.
Carnation Company appeals a judgment on a verdict which upheld the finding of the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals that Madge Hill had sustained an industrial injury while working for Carnation. Carnation is self-insured for industrial insurance purposes. *808The primary issues concern the Superior Court's exclusion of medical records considered by the Board and its award of attorney fees to Ms. Hill. We affirm the portion of the judgment upholding the Board's finding, but reverse the Superior Court's award of fees.
Ms. Hill was employed by Carnation in 1977. On March 3, 1983, this…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. DavenportWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Rice v. JanovichWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Harbor Plywood Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Pennsylvania Life Insurance v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- CARNATION COMPANY, INC. v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- Nichols v. LackieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- CARNATION COMPANY, INC. v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- German Lopez Castro, Appellant/cross-respondent v. State Of Washington, Respondent/cross-appellantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.