Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anderson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1926No. Docket No. 4138Published

1Dissent

CRAIG, J., Dissenting.

I dissent. The important facts in this action are, that the plaintiff was robbed of a dia mond taken from a pin which she was wearing while on board the battleship “Texas,” then anchored in the Los Angeles harbor. It was stipulated that she “distinctly felt a person’s hand grasp the pin.” Recovery is sought upon a contract of insurance; the body of the policy is one insuring against burglary of the assured’s dwelling, and a rider attached thereto purports to further protect from “loss from highway robbery by force or violence.” The pin was fastened to the waist worn by…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Steamboat Co. v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. United States v. BevansSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  4. Robinson v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. Oregon v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API