Legal Opinion
Albus v. Albus
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 14, 1986No. 84-1426PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to reduce child support payments ordered in a proceeding under the District of Columbia Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), D.C. Code §§ 30-301 et seq. (1981). Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion because he produced sufficient evidence to support a reduction in his payments in accordance with the parties’ voluntary separation agreement. Because the trial court applied the incorrect standard in denying the motion, we reverse and remand.
I
The parties were married in 1965 and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hamilton Ex Rel. Hamilton v. HamiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Cooper v. CooperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Oglesby v. OglesbyUtah Supreme Court · 1973
- Sheridan v. SheridanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Ainbender v. AinbenderSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Duffy v. DuffyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Nelson v. NelsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Brookins v. BrookinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Hamel v. HamelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Kammerman v. KammermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.