Legal Opinion
Irvin v. Heckler
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 7, 1984No. 84 Civ. 343(RJW)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
This action is brought pursuant to sections 205(g) and 1631(c)(3) of the Social Security Act (the “Act”) as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3), for judicial review of a final decision by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”), which terminated plaintiff’s supplemental security income based on disability (“SSI”) (hereinafter “disability benefits”). The Secretary held that, as of February 1983, plaintiff no longer suffered from a “disability” within the meaning of the Act. Plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stieberger v. HecklerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Ramilaben Patel v. Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021