Legal Opinion

Carr v. Hull

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1901Published

Error to the Circuit Court of Summit county. '

1Opinion of the CourtMinshall, C. J.

The question in this case concerns the power of an administrator to cause the lands of a decedent to be sold to pay debts of the decedent, where the petition fails to aver, and no evidence is offered that there are any such debts. Edwin Hull, a resident of Summit county, died in 1892 intestate. He left seven children, one of w,hom, a daughter, having intermarried, subsequently died, leaving a minor child, and Gideon Carr was appointed its guardian. He also left a farm worth about $4,-000, and some personalty. No administration was taken out. upon his estate until July 15, 1897, when one…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Drinkwater v. DrinkwaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Farrar v. DeanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  3. Falley v. GriblingIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Fitzgerald v. GlancyIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Walker v. DiehlIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API