People v. Clark
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUCKLEY, J.
In a case of first impression, we hold in the published part of this opinion that possession of a counterfeit bank bill does not constitute possession of a thing made use of in counterfeiting within the meaning of Penal Code section 480. 1
The Facts
On July 12, 1990, defendant attempted to purchase beer from a market in Ridgecrest with a suspiciously blurred $20 bill which looked like play money. Tender of the bill was rejected by the clerk; defendant asked for the return of the bill, saying that he wanted to keep it as a souvenir.
Before defendant drove away, a market employee…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Stafford v. Realty Bond Service Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. GuilfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Fjords North, Inc. v. HahnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- People v. MadranaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. SisuphanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- County of Los Angeles v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.