Legal Opinion

People v. Clark

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 1992No. F015210PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUCKLEY, J.

In a case of first impression, we hold in the published part of this opinion that possession of a counterfeit bank bill does not constitute possession of a thing made use of in counterfeiting within the meaning of Penal Code section 480. 1

The Facts

On July 12, 1990, defendant attempted to purchase beer from a market in Ridgecrest with a suspiciously blurred $20 bill which looked like play money. Tender of the bill was rejected by the clerk; defendant asked for the return of the bill, saying that he wanted to keep it as a souvenir.

Before defendant drove away, a market employee…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Stafford v. Realty Bond Service Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  5. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. GuilfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Fjords North, Inc. v. HahnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  3. People v. MadranaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. People v. SisuphanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. County of Los Angeles v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API