Legal Opinion

Majestic Silk Mills, Inc. v. Wenrich

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 9, 1935Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff obtained a warrant of attachment against the defendants on the ground that they were non-residents. Personal service was made on one of the defendants outside of the State of New York. Such service is improper and was not authorized -by either section 15 or 21 of the Municipal Court Code, as amended. (Long Island Machinery & Equipment Co., Inc., v. Jacobs, 155 Misc. 794; Mayefsky v. Davis, 139 id. 506; Weil, Inc., v. Popper, 143 id. 684.) The denial of the defendants’ motion to vacate the service was error.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted, with ten dollars…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Long Island Machinery & Equipment Co. v. JacobsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API