King v. King

Appellee brought this suit against appellant for a divorce, and appellant sued appellee by way of cross-action to recover certain sums of money as damages for rent, etc.

Appellee alleged that appellant was guilty of excesses, cruel treatment, and outrages against her of such a nature as to render their living together insupportable. Appellant answered by general denial, and by cross-action set up that by final judgment of the district court. of Cameron county, rendered April 9,1919, it had been adjudged that lot 1, block 31, in San Benito, together with the improvements thereon, belonged to…