Legal Opinion

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Whaley

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 25, 2008No. Civil JFM 07-826PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.

In a Memorandum Opinion I issued on June 16, 2008, I denied third-party defendant Compton & Sons’ motion for summary judgment. Pac. Indem. Co. v. Whaley, 560 F.Supp.2d 425, 427 (D.Md.2008). Compton & Sons (“Compton”) has moved for me to reconsider two of my conclusions: (1) that the economic loss doctrine does not shield Compton from tort liability; and (2) that third-party plaintiff Wha-ley’s indemnification claim must survive summary judgment because plaintiff Pacific Indemnity Company’s complaint did not specifically allege that Whaley…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jacques v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Saratoga Fishing Co. v. J. M. Martinac & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Council of Co-Owners Atlantis Condominium, Inc. v. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alcoa Concrete & Masonry, Inc. v. Stalker Bros.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Critical Systems, LLC v. Addison HVAC,LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API