Legal Opinion

Ayers Ratliff, et al. v. Ray Grogan, et al.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 5, 2025No. 3:25-cv-01635Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Ayers Ratliff, et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-1635 Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Ray Grogan, et al., Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Ray Grogan, David Stamolis, and Mark Weaver have filed a motion to stay this litigation while state court criminal proceedings against Plaintiffs Ayers and Heidi Ratliff are ongoing. (Doc. No. 12). After Plaintiffs opposed that motion, (Doc. No. 15), Defendants filed a brief in reply. (Doc. No. 16). Plaintiffs also filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Moore v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API