Legal Opinion

Secor v. Tradesmen's National Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiffs, James F. Secor, Jr., and another, as executors, etc., from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 3d day of March, 1911, upon the decision of the court rendered after-a trial at the New York Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

The firm of Burgess & Secor, composed of Phineas Burgess, Charles A. Secor and James F. Secor, was interested prior to the year 1884 in a contract made with the government of the United States for the construction of a monitor. The firm had a claim for damages against the government arising out of certain delays, acts and omissions on the part of the latter. ■ Phineas Burgess and Charles A. Secor both died in December, 1884, leaving James F. Secor as the sole surviving partner of the firm. The interests of the various partners in the firm had been as follows: Phineas Burgess…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. . WhedonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Bush Co. v. GibbonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Prescott v. KreherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Layman v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API