Vollmeke v. Nielson
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
Pursuant to the provisions of section 51, on page 33 of the Practice Book (1934), and of section 5620 of the General Statutes, Revision of 1930, the defendants have filed a motion for a bond of $75 to prosecute.
The amount of the bond sought ($75) is the usual amount given in such actions, and is proper.
Although the plaintiff is described as a resident of Connecti' cut, there was no certification of his financial responsibility under section 27, on page 27 of the' Practice Book, and section 5619 of the General Statutes as amended (in a matter immaterial to the present inquiry) by section 1653c…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lovejoy v. IsbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Crane v. LoomisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- "Harris Millinery Supply" v. Harris GansConnecticut Superior Court · 1936
3Cited by3 opinions
- D'Ausilio v. KnollConnecticut Appellate Court · 1968
- Gerace v. BentleySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Sinoway Family Partnership v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Superior Court · 2007