Legal Opinion

Planters & Mechanics Bank v. Floeck

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 2, 1897PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Harris. Tried below before Hon. S. H. Bbasheab.

1Opinion of the Court

Conclusions of Fact. — The appellee, a judgment creditor of one W.D. Alexander, garnished the appellants, the Planters and Mechanics Bank and James A. Patton, the president of said bank, on December 5, 1891. The petition averred that the affiant had reason to believe that the said bank and Patton were indebted to the said Alexander, or that they had in their hands effects belonging to the defendant Alexander.

On the 5th day of January, 1892, the said bank answered, denying any indebtedness from it to the said Alexander, at the time of the service of the writ of garnishment, or since that time,…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Alexander v. BerkmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Consolidated Gasoline Co. v. Jarecki Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Shropshire v. Alvarado State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Jarecki Manufacturing Co. v. Consolidated Gasoline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Dupree v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API