Legal Opinion
Dalrymple v. Southland Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 21, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered May 28, 1992, as granted the motion by the respondents Southland Corporation and Third Clarkland Properties Corp. and the separate motion by the respondent Maryann Kwasnik for summary judgment, and dismissed the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them and all cross-claims asserted against them, and (2) so much of a judgment of the same court, dated June 19, 1992, as is entered thereon.
Ordered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Sherman v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rann v. HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by8 opinions
- Candi Bregartner v. Southland Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Holiday v. PoffenbargerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Bregartner v. Southland Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Ahigian v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- GUTIERREZ, SAMIA v. LUTZ BROTHERS, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.