Legal Opinion
Walsh v. Hagee
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 9, 2015No. Civil Action No. 11-2215 (RWR)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge
Pro se plaintiff Rory M. Walsh moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) for reconsideration of the March 4, 2014 memorandum order denying Walsh’s second motion for reconsideration1 and denying all other motions as moot. Walsh once again reasserts legal arguments previously raised and rejected, argues that there is a change in controlling law, and asserts that the final judgment is void. Because Walsh has not established that he is entitled to relief from the final judgment under Rule 60(b)(6), his motion will be denied.
Walsh is a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Good Luck Nursing Home, Inc. D/B/A Magnolia Gardens Nursing Home v. Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Kramer, Mark Lee v. Rumsfeld, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension v. Pittston Company, United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust v. Rawl Sales & Processing Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re: Fannie mae/freddie Mac Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement Class Action LitigationsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Parker v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024