Legal Opinion

Carner v. Ratner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 20, 1968No. Nos. 67-486, 67-487PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Jack earner’s two interlocutory appeals to challenge two orders of the chancellor below have been consolidated.

His first argument on appeal is that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure have abrogated a pure bill for discovery.

We find no specific language in the Rules of Civil Procedure indicating an intent to abrogate, or abolish, the traditional right of a court to entertain pure bills of discovery. In First Nat. Bank of Miami v. Dade-Broward Co., 125 Fla. 594, 171 So. 510 (1937), the court stated:

“The bill in controversy is a pure bill for discovery.
“Such a bill lies to obtain the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Miami v. Dade-Broward Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Poling v. Petroleum Carrier Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Car Rental v. SanchezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. G. H. Crawford Co. Financial Services v. GochDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API