Legal Opinion

Archer v. Milwaukee Auto Engine & Supply Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: Okrest T. Williams, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

The plaintiff was the owner of a boat and an engine. The defendant agreed to furnish the necessary connections and accessories and install the engine in the boat under a certain warranty as to material and workmanship, in consideration of $227.72. This action is brought to recover damages for breach of the warranty. The sixth question in the special verdict and the answers thereto were as follows:

“6. If the court should be of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover against the defendant in this action, what sum will reasonably compensate the plaintiff:
“(a) Eor the difference in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fisk v. TankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. J. Thompson Manufacturing Co. v. GundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Kane v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Univest Corp. v. General Split Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hammond v. Sandwich Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Young v. MandisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API