Legal Opinion

Glover v. Burke

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 10, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownoyer, J.

This is an action for damages for malpractice. It was averred, in substance, in the declaration, that the defendant, Dr. Glover, was employed as a surgeon to remove a small growth known as a cyst or chalazion formed on the underside of plaintiff’s eyelid, and to treat the same, and that he negligently removed the cyst and injured her eyeball, which was allowed to become infected, and while in this condition he negligently treated the eye and did not use ordinary skill and ability, with a result that the eyeball became inflamed and seriously affected and had to be removed.

The defendant pleaded…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Odeneal v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Beech v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCay Ex Rel. McCay v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  2. Osborne v. FrazorCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
  3. Curtis ex rel. Tedder v. Van DusenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  4. Merryman v. BunchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API