Legal Opinion
Revo v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court for the New Mexico
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1997No. 96-2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Defendants, members of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of New Mexico (the Board), appeal from the district court’s order enjoining enforcement of Rule 16-701(C)(4) of the New Mexico Rules of Professional Conduct. 1 Rule 16-701(0(4) bans all attorney direct mail advertisements to personal injury victims and family members of wrongful death victims, unless the recipient of the solicitation is a relative of the attorney sending the letter or has had a prior personal, business or professional relationship with that attorney. The district court found the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Revo v. Disciplinary Board Of The Supreme Court For The State Of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. WengerDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2003