Legal Opinion

BA Commercial Corp. v. Hynutek, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided January 8, 1986No. 05-85-00293-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEVANY, Justice.

BA Commercial Corporation appeals a summary judgment granted in favor of Hy-nutek, Inc. for $320,000. In seven points of error, BA Commercial complains that the trial court erred in: (1) granting summary judgment because Hynutek had not established that there was no remaining issue of material fact; (2) refusing to allow BA Commercial to file a supplemental answer and response; (3) dismissing two co-defendants from the action; (4) entering a summary judgment that did not conform to the pleadings; and (5) entering a summary judgment in violation of the automatic stay provision…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Temple-Eastex Inc. v. Addison BankTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Otoe County National Bank v. W & P Trucking, Inc., Charles E. Froelich, William J. Froelich, Jr., and Jack D. CramerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. Garcia v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Smith v. OlsenTexas Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baytown State Bank v. Nimmons, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  2. Exxon Company, U.S.A., a Division of Exxon Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Banque De Paris Et Des Pays-Bas, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. Exxon Company, U.S.A., a Division of Exxon Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Banque De Paris Et Des Pays-Bas, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. Exxon Company, U.S.A., a Division of Exxon Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Banque De Paris Et Des Pays-Bas, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API