Jose Rodriguez-Saragosa v. Jefferson Sessions, III
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge:
Jose Luis Rodriguez-Saragosa's application for cancellation of removal was denied for reasons that have since become legally infirm. But rather than challenge his removal from abroad, Rodriguez-Saragosa reentered the country illegally. More than a decade later, immigration authorities re-apprehended him, and he moved the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) to reopen his original removal proceedings.
The difficulty, however, is 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (a)(5), which provides: "If the [Secretary of Homeland Security] finds that an alien has reentered the United States…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Fernandez-Vargas v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Dada v. MukaseySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Reyes Mata v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Jose Mejia v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Alfonso Padilla Cuenca v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Melida Luna-Garcia De Garcia v. William Barr, U. SCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Damien Williams v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Melida Luna-Garcia v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.