Legal Opinion

Jose Rodriguez-Saragosa v. Jefferson Sessions, III

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 14, 2018No. 16-60515PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge:

Jose Luis Rodriguez-Saragosa's application for cancellation of removal was denied for reasons that have since become legally infirm. But rather than challenge his removal from abroad, Rodriguez-Saragosa reentered the country illegally. More than a decade later, immigration authorities re-apprehended him, and he moved the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) to reopen his original removal proceedings.

The difficulty, however, is 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (a)(5), which provides: "If the [Secretary of Homeland Security] finds that an alien has reentered the United States…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Fernandez-Vargas v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Dada v. MukaseySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Reyes Mata v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jose Mejia v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. Alfonso Padilla Cuenca v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Melida Luna-Garcia De Garcia v. William Barr, U. SCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  4. Damien Williams v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  5. Melida Luna-Garcia v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API