Legal Opinion
United States v. Stuart Allen Perkal
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 30, 1976No. 75--1435PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:
Convicted of violation of the federal mail fraud statute, 1 and of aiding and abetting the violation thereof, 2 the defendant has appealed. In essence, he contests the sufficiency of the evidence. We find the evidence sufficient to support the conviction and affirm, except for correction of sentence, as hereinafter provided for.
The defendant does not deny the existence of a fraudulent scheme and practice or his participation in it. It is his contention on appeal that his connection with the scheme was not such as to bring his conduct within the mail fraud statute. The…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. MazeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. James Finis Toney, Jr., and John H. Stewart, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. William Peters, Richard F. Ellis, and Peters Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Herbert G. Blecker, United States of America v. Icarus CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Kronfeld v. First Jersey National BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- United States v. Charles L. Rodgers, Anthony J. Bertucci Construction Co., Inc., Mack A. Mathis, Alois Luhr and Luhr Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.