Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Harida

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 1980No. 951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order striking an appeal from an arbitration award for failure to file sufficient recognizance.1

On December 22, 1977, an arbitration panel entered an award against appellants in the amount of $1,146.49, with interest and costs. On January 9, 1978, appellants filed a timely appeal from the award and filed a cash bond of $100 with the prothonotary of the lower court; appellants also paid costs of $70.75 and the arbitrators’ fee of $105.

Appellee filed a motion to strike the appeal, alleging that appellants’ bond was insufficient. In support of its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Sanders & Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Klugman v. Gimbel Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Parisi v. PHILA. ZONING BD. OF ADJUST.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Weber v. LynchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Brock's Assigned Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pullium v. Laurel School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Sheehan v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Rhode Island Recreational Building Authority v. Industrial National Bank of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  4. M. A. Payne Enterprises v. H & M DistributingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Ri Rec. Bldg. Auth. v. Indus. Nat. BankSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API