Legal Opinion
In re Lawrence Children
New York City Family Court
Decided July 2, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Daniel Turbow, J.
Respondents in these two neglect proceedings brought pursuant to article 10 of the Family Court Act are mothers who are, or recently were, in foster care under the jurisdiction of the Administration for Children’s Services (ACS). By this consolidated motion,2 respondents argue that ACS has a conflict of interest in prosecuting cases which seek a finding of neglect against persons for whom they serve as parens patriae. As the primary remedy for this alleged conflict, they seek an order relieving ACS “as the petitioner in the instant matters . . . and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- MATTER OF LEE TT. v. DowlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re Lorie C.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Camardo v. New York State RailwaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In re Katherine C.New York Family Court · 1984
- Weber v. Stony Brook HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- C.M. v. C.H.New York Supreme Court · 2004
- In re Ta Fon Edward J.B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re Nurayah J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Rocke v. TurbowDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024