Legal Opinion

Hoke v. State ex rel. Payne

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1935No. 2546PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*518OPINION

By THE COURT

The above entitled cause is now being determined on motion of defendant in error to dismiss the petition in error for the reason that no bill of exceptions has been filed within the time prescribed by law.

It has been definitely determined by the Supreme Court of this state in the case of Townsend v Harrison, 53 Oh St, 398, that where the assignments of error-are founded solely upon a bill of exceptions taken in a lower court but not filed within the statutory peried, the proper procedure is to affirm the judgment rather than dismiss. In the instant case it very clearly…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Continental Automobile Mutual Ins v. MortonOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Mori v. Van HyningOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Pitts v. BreyfogleOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API