Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Santana

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 14, 2011No. 4D11-1856PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether the trial court erred in expanding the scope of a noticed case management hearing into a final hearing on appellee’s petition to determine paternity. Appellant, the mother, claims that she did not receive proper notice that a final hearing on appellee’s petition was going to proceed instead of the case management conference which had been noticed. We agree and find that the trial court erred.

Appellee filed a petition to determine paternity and to award him parental responsibility and custody. The court sent a notice of a case management conference…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shiver v. WhartonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. Margulies v. MarguliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Schuman v. INTERNATIONAL CONSUMER CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shah v. ShahDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Carson-Grayson v. GraysonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. WANDA I. RUFIN, P.A. v. ALICIA MARIA BORGADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API