Legal Opinion

State v. LaForest

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 26, 1965No. 5288PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

Polygraph and scientific tests to determine deception are familiar investigative devices in criminal investigation and are employed generally in industry and government for various purposes. Inbau & Reid, Lie Detection and Criminal Interrogation (3d ed. 1953); Silving, Testing the Unconscious in Criminal Cases, 69 Harv. L. Rev. 683 (1956); 50 A.B.A. J. 470 (1964). See also, Hearings Before Committee on Government Operations of House of Representatives, “Use of Polygraphs as ‘Lie Detectors’ by the Federal Government,” 88th Cong. 2d Sess. Parts 1, 2, 3 and 4 (1964). Nevertheless the results of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. The People v. BoneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. FataloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. People v. HouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. State v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. BiddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. State v. DeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. HamlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. MendesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API