Ex Parte Sentell
Texas Supreme Court
1Dissent
Justices Smith,
joined by Justices Griffin and Calvert, dissenting.
We respectfully dissent. The rule announced by the majority should not be and, in our opinion, is not the law. The court’s judgment in this case is void for the reason that there is no evidence to sustain it. Moreover, even in the absence of supporting evidence, the judgment itself does not contain recitations of facts necessary to its validity.
In the case of Ex Parte Fisher, 146 Texas 328, 206 S.W. 2d 1000, this Court said in part: “Whether he committed the act charged is conclusively determined by the order or judgment of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex parte FisherTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Ex Parte DuncanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Ex Parte SnodgrassCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Ex Parte KearbyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Crites v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.