Legal Opinion

Alper v. Nowakowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the decision at Special Term, Roy, J., and the following memorandum: We add only that the attack on the constitutionality of section 82 of the General City Law is unfounded. (See Ottinger v Arenal Realty Co., 257 NY 371, 377-379.) Petitioners state that the statute operates to deprive them of their property rights without due process of law because there is no provision for notice. Petitioners were not only on notice of the proceedings of the Board of Zoning Appeals, but appeared and testified. The fact that they were not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ottinger v. Arenal Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Broadcasting Corp. v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Pagliaroli v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Astoria Landing, Inc. v. New York City CouncilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API