Legal Opinion

Privett v. Stevens

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Original Proceedings in Mandamus. ON the 4th of January, .1881, on the petition of Fletcher P. Privett, an alternative writ of mandamus was issued out of this court, and directed to T. H. Stevens, F. JB.

Read the full summary

Original Proceedings in Mandamus. ON the 4th of January, .1881, on the petition of Fletcher P. Privett, an alternative writ of mandamus was issued out of this court, and directed to T. H. Stevens, F. JB. Singer, and J. W. Clehouse, commissioners of Harper county, and II. 0. Meigs, county clerk thereof, commanding the said commissioners, as a canvassing board, to meet on the 18th day of January, 1881, at the office of the county clerk of that county, and then and there to canvass the returns of the election held therein November 2, 1880, for the office of sheriff thereof, and' declare the…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

VALENTINE, J.:

This is an original action of mandamus, brought in this court by Fletcher P. Privett against T. H. Stevens, F. B. Singer and J. W. Clehouse, the county commissioners of Harper county, Kansas, and H. O. Meigs, the county clerk of said county, to compel them to canvass certain election returns. The plaintiff claims that, at the November election, in 1880, he was duly elected to fill a vacancy in the office of sheriff of said county; and claims that the defendants, without any legal excuse therefor, have persistently refused to canvass the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Privett v. BickfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Smith v. LawrenceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Coates v. CampSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  4. State Ex Rel. Stone v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API