Legal Opinion

Widing v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1905No. Nos. 14,323—(125)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county by Hilda Widing as mother of Vendela Widing, an infant, to recover $1,975 for personal injuries. The case was tried before Willard R. Cray, J., who granted a motion to-dismiss upon the close of plaintiff’s testimony. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

The plaintiff, the mother of a female infant child (the father having died) brings this action to recover for injuries sustained by the infant. At the close of the plaintiff’s testimony defendant moved for a dismissal, which was granted. A new trial was asked, which was denied. From this order plaintiff appeals.

The evidence reasonably tends to support the following facts: The infant was six and a half years of age at the time of the accident. Her mother rented of defendant an apartment, which was one of numerous suites of flats of a large building fronting on Washington avenue, in…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davies v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Farley v. ByersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Anderson v. WinkleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Williams v. DicksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Miller v. HooperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API