Legal Opinion
Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 15, 1930No. 3842PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the case as above).
The appellant insists that the evidence does not justify the conclusion that Mrs. Mitchell’s injury was either (1) an accidental injury originating in the work of her employer, or (2) was an injury received by her while she was engaged in and about the furtherance of the affairs or business of her employer. It is believed the facts show an “injury” within the meaning of that term as defined in the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Article 8309, R. S. part 4. It was proven that Mrs. Mitchell was vaccinated, and that the vaccination wound became directly infected,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Matter of Connelly v. Hunt Furniture Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Dove v. Alpena Hide & Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Bailey v. Interstate Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Alewine v. Tobin Quarries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. ClackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Saintsing v. Steinbach CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Whitfield v. Daniel Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.