Legal Opinion
Fustok v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 20, 1985No. 82 Civ. 1538(MEL)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
In another of a seemingly unending stream of motions by all parties defendants Walter Goldschmidt and Continental Grain Company (“ContiGrain”) move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings dismissing Fustok’s twenty-first claim. The facts in this action for fraud in connection with various silver transactions involving Fustok’s commodity trading account with ContiCommodity Services, Inc. (“Conti”) are set forth in, among other decisions, Fustok v. ContiCommodity Services, Inc., 577 F.Supp. 852, 853-55 (S.D.N.Y.1984).
According to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1996
- Lehman Bros. Commercial v. Minmetals International Non-Ferrous Metals Trading Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Gruber v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1987
- In Re Amaranth Natural Gas Commodities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Khalid Bin Alwaleed Foundation v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.