United States v. Marsten Apartments, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
KOMIVES, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. OPINION
A. Background
1. Procedural Background
The United States of America brings this action pursuant to the Fair Housing Act of 1988, 42 U.S.C. § 3614(a). The United States alleges that defendants have engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination on the basis of race, color, and familial status at the Marsten Apartments, located in Allen Park, Michigan. On May 1, 1997, Judge Cohn referred all pending and future nondispositive motions to me for hearing and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chardon v. FernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hughes v. Lillian Goldman Family, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- United States v. Taigen & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2003
- United States v. HarrisonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Picard v. Estate of Mendelow (In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Bernardez v. Firstsource Solutions USA, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.