Legal Opinion

Pacific Aviation Co. v. Philbrick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1912No. 9758PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered May 8, 1911, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action upon a promissory note.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This is a suit upon a promissory note. There was a judgment for the defendants for their costs. The plaintiff has appealed.

The respondents admit the execution and delivery of the note, and affirmatively allege, in substance and effect, that, *415on or about July 1, 1910, the appellant owned a Curtiss biplane and engine; that the respondents, being then desirous of giving certain exhibitions of aeroplane flights at Hoquiam, entered into negotiations with the appellant; that the note represents a part of the consideration for the bi-plane and engine; that the appellant, for the purpose of inducing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Davis Calyx Drill Co. v. MalloryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Hockersmith v. FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Buffalo Pitts Co. v. ShrinerWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dennison v. HardenWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Grubb v. HouseWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Singmaster v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Titan Truck Co. v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Schnitzer v. Panhandle Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API